Loading your experience...
Preparing something amazing for you
From beginners building foundational skills to senior engineers refining advanced techniques: the app assesses exactly where you are and generates a learning plan impossible with traditional courses.
Our users are extraordinary. These are real people in the real world gaining a measurable edge with AI fluency. No stock photos, no made-up quotes—click through to visit their actual profiles.
This isn't a generic course. It's a context accumulation engine.
Every assessment, every gap identified, every interaction feeds into increasingly personalized learning. A coherent curriculum that compounds on itself, thinking multiple moves ahead based on evidence of what you actually need.
The assessment measures five dimensions that transfer across any AI: prompt mastery, technical understanding, practical application, critical evaluation, and workflow design. These aren't tool-specific tricks. They're foundational skills that unlock capability regardless of which model you're using.
The score is deliberately hard. Most land between 2-5. That's not a failure. It's a starting point. The learning plan meets you there and builds. Check the leaderboard. Some users are cracking 9. They didn't start there. They earned it.
Here's what that looks like in practice. This week, a user reached out about their learning plan. What they showed stopped me in my tracks: the system had created SPECTRA, a structured prompting framework, specifically to address their pattern of underspecifying context and constraints. Module 1 built the framework. Module 2 referenced "your hard-won SPECTRA insights" and used it as scaffolding for the next skill. It even identified their teaching instinct and channeled it into exercises.
The leaderboard proves it. I expected young tech natives to dominate. Instead? A 50-year workforce veteran architecting legislative document analysis. A 40-year Microsoft/Google engineer treating AI agents as a "managed fleet." A history teacher catching hallucinations before they reach students. Security professionals who assume AI is lying and build verification systems to prove it. The people winning aren't prompt engineers. They're professionals who were already great at their jobs.
